CAS Dismisses Vinesh Phogat's Appeal for Joint Silver Medal in Paris Olympics Wrestling Competition

 

I. Introduction

The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) Ad-Hoc Division recently dismissed Indian wrestler Vinesh Phogat's application challenging her disqualification from the Women's Freestyle 50kg competition at the 2024 Paris Olympics. This case highlights the strict application of weight category rules in international wrestling competitions and raises questions about the balance between maintaining fairness and considering exceptional circumstances in elite sports.

II. Background of the Case

A. The Weigh-ins and Disqualification

Vinesh Phogat, an accomplished Indian wrestler, was set to compete in the final of the Women's Freestyle 50kg category at the 2024 Paris Olympics on August 7, 2024. On August 6, she successfully passed the initial weigh-in at 49.9 kg and won three matches, securing her place in the final. However, during the second weigh-in on the morning of August 7, Phogat exceeded the 50 kg limit by 150 g. After a permitted 15-minute grace period, she weighed in again but was still 100 g over the limit.

B. The Challenge

Following her disqualification, Phogat filed an application with the CAS Ad-Hoc Division on August 7, 2024, at 16:45 (Paris time), seeking several forms of relief:

1. Setting aside the disqualification decision

2. Remaining eligible for the silver medal

3. Requesting a re-weighing before the finals

4. Seeking eligibility to participate in the finals

By the time the Sole Arbitrator was appointed on August 8, 2024, the finals had already taken place and medals awarded. Consequently, Phogat withdrew her requests for re-weighing and participation in the finals.

III. Legal Analysis

A. Applicable Rules and Regulations

The case centered on the interpretation and application of the United World Wrestling International Wrestling Rules 2023 (the Rules), particularly Articles 7, 8, and 11. These articles outline the weight categories, competition organization, and consequences of failing to meet weight requirements.

B. Key Arguments

1. Applicant's Position

Phogat's legal team argued that exceptional circumstances led to her weight gain, including:

- The need to eat and drink for health reasons after three difficult competitions

- Limited time between bouts due to venue logistics

- Pre-menstrual fluid retention

They also alleged that the weighing machine might have been faulty.

2. Court's Assessment

The Sole Arbitrator, Dr. Annabelle Bennett, made several key observations:

a) Rule Interpretation: The Rules were found to be clear regarding weight limits, with no tolerance provided. The 50 kg limit was deemed an absolute upper limit, applicable throughout the entire competition.

b) Olympic Games Classification: The Arbitrator concluded that the Olympic Games do not fall under the category of "International Tournaments" in Article 8, which might have allowed for weight tolerance.

c) Competition Definition: The entire Olympic wrestling tournament was considered a single competition, requiring wrestlers to maintain eligibility throughout all stages.

d) Consequences of Ineligibility: Article 11 of the Rules was interpreted to mean that failing a weigh-in at any stage results in elimination from the entire competition, not just the specific round.

IV. Court's Conclusions

The Sole Arbitrator drew several significant conclusions:

1. Voluntary Participation: Phogat entered the 50 kg category of her own free will, knowing the weight requirements.

2. Rule Clarity: Despite some infelicitous language, the Rules were found to be unambiguous when interpreted in context.

3. No Acquired Rights: The Rules require weight eligibility throughout the competition, with no rights acquired from partial participation.

4. IOC Authority: The CAS lacks the power to award medals, as this falls under the sole authority of the International Olympic Committee (IOC).

5. Elimination Consequences: Failing the second weigh-in resulted in elimination from the entire competition and being ranked last, without rank, precluding the awarding of a silver medal.

V. Implications and Commentary

This case underscores the strict application of weight category rules in international wrestling. While the Arbitrator acknowledged the "draconian" nature of the consequences, the decision emphasizes the importance of clear and consistently applied rules in maintaining fairness in sports competitions.

The case also raises questions about the potential need for more flexible rules that could account for exceptional circumstances or biological factors affecting athletes' weight. However, any such changes would need to be carefully balanced against the principles of fairness and equal treatment of all competitors.

VI. Conclusion

The CAS decision in Vinesh Phogat's case reaffirms the primacy of established rules in international sports competitions. While the outcome may seem harsh given Phogat's performance in earlier rounds, it highlights the critical importance of maintaining weight eligibility throughout a tournament. This case serves as a reminder to athletes and sports organizations of the need for strict adherence to weight category regulations, even in high-stakes competitions like the Olympic Games.

References:

1. Court of Arbitration for Sport. (2024). Vinesh Phogat v. United World Wrestling & IOC (CAS OG 24/17).

2. United World Wrestling. (2023). International Wrestling Rules.

3. International Olympic Committee. (2024). Olympic Charter.

4. Bennett, A. (2024). Award in CAS OG 24/17 Vinesh Phogat v. United World Wrestling & IOC.

5. Court of Arbitration for Sport. (2024). Media Release: Wrestling - OG 2024 - CAS Dismisses the Application Filed by Vinesh Phogat (IND).

Written by 

Akshay Singh Rawat

LinkedIn