LANDMARK JUDGMENTS - Sh. Dhanraj Pillay And Others vs M/S Hockey India

 

Introduction:

The Competition Commission of India (CCI) is a statutory body established under the Competition Act, 2002 with the aim of preventing anti-competitive practices and promoting competition in the Indian market. The CCI is empowered to investigate complaints related to anti-competitive practices and take appropriate action to prevent such practices. One of the important cases heard by the CCI was the case of Sh. Dhanraj Pillay and others vs M/S Hockey India, which was heard on May 31, 2013.

Background:

Sh. Dhanraj Pillay and others filed a complaint against Hockey India, alleging that Hockey India was abusing its dominant position in the market for organizing and promoting the sport of hockey in India. The complaint alleged that Hockey India was imposing restrictive conditions on players, coaches, and officials and charging high fees for the use of equipment and other resources. These actions were seen as anti-competitive practices that were intended to stifle competition and restrict the growth of the sport of hockey in India.

Investigation by the CCI:

The CCI conducted an extensive investigation into the matter and found that Hockey India was indeed abusing its dominant position in the market. The CCI found that Hockey India was imposing restrictive conditions on players, coaches, and officials and charging high fees for the use of equipment and other resources. These actions were seen as anti-competitive practices that were intended to stifle competition and restrict the growth of the sport of hockey in India.

Decision of the CCI:

Based on the findings of its investigation, the CCI found Hockey India guilty of abusing its dominant position and imposed a fine of INR 2 crore on Hockey India. The CCI also ordered Hockey India to cease and desist from imposing restrictive conditions on players, coaches, and officials and from charging high fees for the use of equipment and other resources.

Impact of the Decision:

The CCI’s decision in this case sent a strong message to dominant players in the market that they cannot engage in anti-competitive practices and that such practices will not be tolerated. The CCI’s decision was also seen as a positive step towards promoting and sustaining fair competition in the Indian market. The CCI’s decision demonstrated the important role that the CCI plays in ensuring fair competition in the Indian market and protecting the interests of consumers and players.

Conclusion:

The case of Sh. Dhanraj Pillay and others vs M/S Hockey India was a landmark case in the history of competition law in India. This case was significant for several reasons. Firstly, it was one of the first cases in which the CCI applied the provisions of the Competition Act, 2002, to a sporting body. Secondly, the CCI’s decision demonstrated that the provisions of the Competition Act, 2002 are applicable to sporting bodies and that they cannot engage in anti-competitive practices. This case serves as an important precedent for future cases involving anti-competitive practices in the sports industry. The CCI’s decision in this case sent a strong message to dominant players in the market that they cannot engage in anti-competitive practices and that such practices will not be tolerated. The CCI’s decision was also seen as a positive step towards promoting and sustaining fair competition in the Indian market.

Main Order , 31 May,

2013

Competition Commission of India

Written by

Shivendra Kumar

LinkedIn