CURIOUS CASE OF CASINO LEGALIZATION: Exploring the Patchwork Political and Judicial Approach to Gambling in India

“THE HIGHEST FORM OF WISDOM IS TO KNOW WHEN TO PLAY AND WHEN TO STAY AWAY.”

Introduction 

India has an enduring lineage of gaming and wagering traditions dating from antiquity, manifested today in a thriving underground gambling economy worth over $60 billion by certain estimates. However, the organized casino gaming industry governed by codified legal strictures remains in nascent phases of maturation. This dichotomy illuminates the complex challenges that casino commercialization has navigated within the Indian federal structure historically. 

Progress has nonetheless been made, however gradual. This commentary chronicles such advancements. It scrutinizes the legal evolution of casino regulations spanning the British Raj-era edicts against gambling in the subcontinent, followed by post-Independence policy incoherence between prohibition under most state jurisdictions and tacit tolerance of offshore gaming centers, before analyzing current internal divisions on lawfulness from the latest draft central statutes and introducing novel case studies like Sikkim’s pioneering casino economy. 

A comprehensive historical lens thus contextualizes casino governance in India as: (i) building on colonial gambling laws subsequently upheld selectively by Independent India for most regions, yet yielding certain carveouts, while central governments hesitated at nationwide reform; (ii) manifesting said reform tussles recently through failed proposed gambling acts; even as (iii) select sub-federal states like Sikkim embraced controlled casino commercialization within their borders, setting notable precedents for the nation. This policy patchwork substantiates why India’s casino regulatory advances have been gradual amid checkered progress to date, though pointing to changing state and central governmental attitudes that compel deeper investigation within the contemporary discourse on betting regulation changes worldwide.

The early post-Independence era 

The early post-Independence period upheld British Victorian attitudes toward gaming through continued prohibition under the 1867 Public Gambling Act and state-level variants that newly Independent India inherited and sporadically enforced. Such laws deemed gambling activities in “common gaming houses” unlawful, while carving out certain skill-dominant games. This allowed horse races and rummy card games to thrive by claiming predominant dependence on player aptitude over pure chance. Casino activities possessed no such recourse for legal sanctuary. 

Police forces even raided makeshift gambling events under these statutes. One 1952 case saw Mumbai police sanction charges against 200 individuals for unlawful gaming in a Mahjong den. Simultaneously however, increased mobility of Indians toward locales internationally permitting casino tourism signaled latent domestic appetite for its legalization domestically. Nonetheless, during this initial two decades ex-British legislation formed the operative foundation for gambling governance pan-India, acting against casino proliferation. Sporadic convictions bookended this phase, like the landmark 1963 Supreme Court verdict affirming the 1867 Act’s validity for gambling offenses, thereby setting further binding precedent against gambling houses. In totality, casino legalization or enabling central laws were inconceivable notions throughout this nascent phase until the global ascent of gaming tourism by the 1960-70s compelled re-examination.

The rise of offshore and cruise casinos from the 1960s onwards

The 1960s bore witness to India’s first encounters with nascent casino commerce, albeit functioning in legally ambiguous offshore waters. This period saw the advent of cruise vessel casinos anchored beyond territorial limits but catering predominantly to foreign travelers, alongside handful of ocean-based casinos on former naval vessels converted into gambling centers docked just outside Indian shores. 

Their disputed legality stemmed from India’s maritime jurisdiction extending only up to 12 nautical miles. Hence these floating/offshore establishments contended operations in international waters put them outside national gambling prohibitions, while also increasing India’s tourism allure. Two court rulings tackled this, albeit reaching conflicting verdicts. A 1964 Kerala High Court judgment deemed offshore Rummy playing beyond state enforcement powers under the 12-nautical mile rule. However, a 1966 Madras High Court ruling counterintuitively declared gambling beyond 5 kilometers from India’s coast as unlawful. Ambiguity thus persisted, but opportunities for casino tourism were seeded during this critical juncture. 

Soon casinos housed on famous foreign cruise liners like M/S Caravela began entering Indian ports routinely while operating onboard gaming, thanks to their foreign registry allowing transit access despite domestic casino curbs as per maritime conventions. This flourishing grey market for quasi-legal offshore casinos starting the mid-20th century crucially introduced the earliest resemble of modern gaming-linked experiences for Indians domestically - even if access remained confined to wealthier classes at first. It marked nascent beginnings preceding the contemporary casino tourism boom worldwide.

Sikkim legalizing casinos in 2009:

A tectonic policy shift transpired in 2009 when Sikkim became India’s first – and hitherto only – state to formally legalize casinos under codified law. This monumental development actualized under the Sikkim Casino Games/Gambling Rules notification authorizing license issuance for land-based gaming houses within state borders. 

The rules delineated comprehensive procedural norms for license procurement, operational enforcement protocols, taxation frameworks and technical conditions applicable for casino operators and equipment. This historic law thus created India’s only lawful domestic casino market expressly permitting table games like American Roulette and Blackjack alongside gaming machines offering slots and virtual derivatives – all lawfully accessible to citizens. 

Paving another milestone, the Sikkim government awarded its first casino operating license in 2010 to Playwin Corporation. Within years, the frontier Himalayan state positioned itself as a gambling tourism and construction hub with over 10 lawful casinos, generating Rs.17 billion recently from license levies and spurring sector investments. Sikkim’s small size however has contained casino proliferation pressures faced internationally. 

Nonetheless, as the sole lawful onshore casino market in India, the state gained prominence as a trigger for renewed nationwide gambling dialogues. Most other states maintained 2000-era bans. Maharashtra’s challenge to offshore casinos in a 2011 Bombay High Court case reaffirmed the 12 nautical mile enforcement limit affecting lawfulness, signaling judicial consensus on separation between landbased prohibition and offshore tolerance precedents set decades prior. But Sikkim evolved India’s judicial attitudes further. The Supreme Court dismissed a public interest litigation in 2015 seeking to revoke Sikkim’s casino licensing law as unconstitutional, thereby setting precedent for state-level casino legalization. While no other state has yet followed suit, Sikkim’s lasting national legacy was instigating new discourse.

Central government attempts at wider casino and gambling legislation: 

Beyond empowering Sikkim’s policy breakthroughs, India’s thriving underground gaming landscape estimated at over $60 billion sparked newer conversations on comprehensive central reforms, manifesting through two unsuccessful legislative efforts. 

The Indian Gambling Act draft bill circulated in 1978 by the Janata Party regime constituted the nation’s pioneer attempt at nationwide gambling regulation. It focused chiefly on taxation, suggesting annual levies between INR 5-25 thousand for gambling operators and 10%-15% excise on participant entry charges. However, lacking discernible enforcement frameworks and opposed by legislatures on cultural grounds, dialogue dissolved abruptly after the Janata government fell, forcing abandonment. 

Thereafter, the 2013 draft Indian Gambling (Regulation & Tax) Bill by Congress initiated another ambitious centralized push at alignment. Seeking to establish a nationwide Gambling Commission empowered to formulate operating requirements while collecting 18% GST from operators besides licensing fees, it targeted generating INR 7,000 crore annually from hitherto opaque betting industries for national development needs. Key provisions included identifying 106 cities for gambling zones introduction and exempting skill-centric card games like Bridge and Rummy from oversight. However RSS cultural objections regarding Indian ethos combined with enforceability concerns impeded progress through Parliamentary disagreements, ultimately dooming its passage – but signaling the legal contours for future discourse. Hence while eliciting debate, both efforts failed, leaving further progress incumbent upon judicial verdicts and state experimentations to shape national discourse.

Analysis of the present scenario and outlook for casino regulation in India:

India’s contemporary casino atmosphere remains in quasi-legal flux even after Sikkim’s trailblazing model, with myopic Commission reports spotlighting the mushrooming unlawful gaming shadow economy pointing to unmet economic appetites. 

Presently, over a dozen lawful casinos operate within Sikkim alone, but prohibited elsewhere barring sporadic offshore enterprises in Goa. Central inertia after failed recent Bills means progress depends upon state-level policy evolutions following Sikkim’sfootsteps or central realignment enabling zone-based allowances. 

Matters remain contentious across national partisan lines regarding perceived social externalities. Meanwhile judicial verdicts continue tackling discrete ambiguities, like the Madras High Court ruling in 2021 distinguishing games of skill (Rummy, chess) warranting constitutional protection over prohibited games of chance (Poker, Roulette), while dismissing Andhra Pradesh’s blanket online gambling ban as unconstitutional given Supreme Court skill vs chance precedents. Hence incremental clarity accrues through courts. 

Thus India’s prospective casino outlook remains in liminal status between echoes demanding prohibition given socio-cultural externalities versus Sikkim’ssmall-scale model pointing to tourism-led possibilities from controlled legalization analogous to Asian jurisidictions. With over 800 million Indians expected online by 2025, enacting regulations harnessing this appetite could hold significant regulatory harmonization advantages if duly enforced. GST potentialities further compel policy examinations beyond moral positions alone. Hence progress, despite fits-and-starts thus far, appears a likelihood in due course once decisive whole-of-government regulatory clarity and enforcement bodies crystallize through legislatures or courts. For now, the next phase remains gestatory amid global sector growth signifying the stakes involved.

Conclusion

In codifying India’s complex casino chronology, several interwoven themes manifest across centuries which illuminate present policy challenges. As seen, British Victorian mores criminalizing gambling annexed into Independent India’s initial prohibitive posture primarily upheld till recently, creating piecemeal judicial carveouts enabling pockets of offshore commerce but preventing organized expansion. 

Consequently, early 21st century factors like growing overseas gaming appetites amid limited domestic avenues, gradually alternating judicial viewpoints differentiating skill vs chance, rising tourism sector aspirations, and appreciating lottery/horse racing markets pointed to burgeoning unregulated betting estimated presently worth over 3% of GDP. 

Thereafter Sikkim inaugurated India’s first lawful onshore casino market in 2009, stirring optimism. However failures to nationally disseminate this model through successive Central legislative attempts underscored enforcement hurdles that left casino tourism neglected, even while IT Act carveouts strengthened skill game protection lately. 

Hence historically, India’s casino atmosphere transitioned from blanket bans to tolerating offshore loopholes before embracing controlled onshore licensing limitedly in Sikkim, setting crucial templates for other jurisdictions - but lacking holistic propagation as yet due to legislative conflicts on gambling morality amidst growing industry awareness of tourism-linked gains. 

Thus persistent regulatory discord persists, against global precedents in equivalently positioned Asian tiger economies that benefited enormously from regulated gaming sectors. With projected 8x growth in India’s digital spheres by 2025, the present void signals immense possibility. But realization remains contingent on the resolution of deeply embedded statutory divisions between economic and sociocultural policy priorities. Once such equilibrium is legislatively forged, the next stage of advancement beckons for this promising arena amid a vastly underserved betting market at scale in India.

Written by

Akshay Singh Rawat

LinkedIn